Your team is spending more on AI coding tools every month
Your team is spending more on AI coding tools every month. Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Codex, and the rest. The bills are real. The output looks impressive. But here's the question nobody can answer: how much of that AI-written code is still in your repo 30 days later? And how much of it leaked into bugs, rework, and refactoring you paid for twice? Vendor dashboards reward tokenmaxxing. More tokens, higher acceptance rates, bigger numbers that feel like progress. None of it tells you if the spend is working. Codelitics measures the output. We compute your Survival Index locally from your repo, across every AI coding tool your team uses: Survival rate. How much AI-authored code is still alive at 7, 30, and 90 days. Verification tax. The time and rework it takes to get that code merged. Cost per durable line. What you actually paid for the code that survived. Tool yield. Which tools earn their spend, and which don't. It runs on your repo. On-prem by default. Tool-vendor neutral. Developers see their own data first, so it's signal, not surveillance. Spend is up. Survival is unmeasured. That's the gap we close.