11 VC firms investing in developer tools & infrastructure and insurance at the Growth stage.
F4 Fund tracks 11 VC firms that actively invest in developer tools & infrastructure + insurance at the Growth stage, with check sizes ranging from $100K – $500M (median: $35M – $35M). As of August 2026, and 100% lead or co-lead rounds. Rankings are based on F4's proprietary analysis of 1,699+ researched VC firms, scored by data completeness, portfolio depth, investment recency, and stage alignment.
| # | Firm | Check Size | Portfolio | Leads? | Activity | Decision | Intro |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ▶ Thrive Capital Back great founders building category-defining companies, regardless of stage. We provide patient capital, hands-on operational support, and deep network access to enable breakout success. New York | $500K – $50M | 24 | Both | Active | ~2 wks | Req'd |
| 2 | ▶ R136 Ventures Identifies inflection points through proprietary Discovery Engine and backs founders who see opportunities others miss. Focuses on AI-driven transformation of B2B software and financial services, with deep technical due diligence analyzing 250+ data points. Woodside, CA | $2M – $20M | 42 | Both | Active | ~1 mo | Open |
| 3 | ▶ Anti Fund The future is forged at the intersection of tech and culture. The best founders are 'anti' by definition—their companies must be highly disruptive to the status quo. While capital is a commodity, attention is not. Anti Fund uniquely wields cultural relevance to source founders and accelerate growth. Miami | $100K – $3M | 20 | Both | Active | ~2 wks | Open |
| 4 | ▶ TCV Identify innovators capturing shifts in technology and behavior that reshape their industries, and empower mission-driven teams toward market-leading scale through a partnership-driven, long-term growth-equity approach. Menlo Park | $10M – $500M | 37 | Both | Active | N/A | N/A |
| 5 | ▶ Zeev Ventures Solo GP model combining angel investing speed with VC-scale checks. Backs non-traditional founders solving their own problems. Rejects process-heavy VC bureaucracy in favor of speed, decisiveness, and founder-first engagement. Palo Alto | $20M – $50M | 23 | Leads | Active | ~1 wk | Open |
| 6 | ▶ Committed Capital Backs post-revenue UK technology companies (£1M+ revenue) with excellent technical solutions to pressing issues in a substantial addressable market, providing hands-on financial and human capital via the EIS structure. London | $500K – $2M | 17 | Both | Active | N/A | N/A |
| 7 | ▶ Dragoneer Investment Group We target leading technology companies with sustainable differentiation and attractive unit economics, backing durable competitive moats such as network effects, proprietary data, and switching costs, and holding positions through full market cycles from late-stage private financing into public markets. San Francisco | $50M – $500M | 30 | Leads | Active | ~1 mo | Req'd |
| 8 | ▶ Qumra Capital Highly analytical, data-driven Israeli technology companies with at least $10M in annualized revenue, scaling toward global category leadership, primarily in the US market. Tel Aviv | $15M – $60M | 28 | Leads | Active | N/A | N/A |
| 9 | ▶ Cathay Innovation Startups positioned as transformation partners with Fortune 500 corporates create the most impactful solutions. We believe the next generation of market leaders will emerge through collaborative innovation between startups and incumbent enterprises, supported by global expertise and capital. Paris | $5M – $100M | 22 | Both | Active | ~1 mo | Req'd |
| 10 | ▶ Caffeinated Capital Support founders pursuing their life's work with an alternative to the hype cycle: the luxury of long-term thinking. We support founders building category-defining companies across all sectors that will last for lifetimes. San Francisco | $1M – $5M | 19 | Leads | Active | N/A | N/A |
| 11 | ▶ Coatue The best investment opportunities emerge at the intersection of innovation and scale. We invest across the full lifecycle from seed to public markets, focusing on technology companies that will transform sectors globally with particular conviction in AI-enabled platforms and infrastructure. New York | $1M – $100M | 31 | Both | Active | ~2 wks | Open |
What other stages do these firms also invest in?
Investors on this page also frequently invest in these sectors
What other sectors do these firms also invest in?
F4 Fund tracks 11 VC firms that actively invest in developer tools & infrastructure + insurance at the Growth stage. These firms are ranked using a composite score that weighs data completeness (30%), portfolio depth (30%), investment recency (25%), and stage alignment (15%).
Based on F4's analysis, the median check size for growth developer tools & infrastructure + insurance investors is $35M – $35M, with a full range from $100K – $500M. The distribution breaks down as: 2 firms in the $1M-$2M range, 1 firms in the $2M-$5M range, 8 firms in the $10M+ range.
Among the 11 firms tracked, 100% lead or co-lead rounds. Founders seeking a lead investor should filter for firms marked "Leads" or "Both" in the rankings table above. Lead investors typically set deal terms and anchor the round.
The best growth developer tools & infrastructure + insurance investors combine domain expertise with an active portfolio in the space. Among these firms, 43% prefer warm introductions, and the average firm has 27 portfolio companies. Look for firms whose check size matches your raise, whose stage preference aligns with yours, and who have a track record of supporting companies in your sector through multiple growth phases.
Firm profiles are continuously updated through F4's research pipeline, which combines LLM-powered web research, portfolio analysis, and transcript extraction. The ranking data refreshes every 12 hours. Editorial analysis is reviewed weekly. Individual firm profiles are re-researched on a 30-day cycle or when new information surfaces.